"People without borders" refers to a vision where humanity transcends divisions such as nationality, ethnicity, and religion, advocating for unity and global cooperation. Those who support this idea envision a unipolar world focused on universal welfare, where global governance promotes equality, peace, and shared prosperity for all. However, within this unipolar framework, they also recognize the value of multipolar regions—regions with distinct cultural, political, and social systems that are empowered to manage their affairs locally.

The concept blends global unity with regional diversity. The overarching global order ensures that fundamental rights, human dignity, and welfare are protected, while allowing different regions to maintain their unique identities and governance models. This balance aims to prevent global hegemony by any single power and promotes regional autonomy within a globally connected world.

Key principles include:

1. Global cooperation for shared challenges (climate change, peace, poverty).

2. Regional autonomy, respecting local customs and governance structures.

3. Promotion of equality and human rights universally.

4. Economic systems that emphasize welfare and collective well-being over competition.

This concept promotes a harmonious balance between unity and diversity, ensuring both global welfare and regional self-determination.

4o

You said:

incorporate principles for democracy and just war principles

ChatGPT said:

ChatGPT

The concept of a "people without borders" promoting a unipolar world with multipolar regions, when incorporating principles of democracy and just war, emphasizes both global welfare and ethical governance, while ensuring that conflicts are minimized and handled with justice. The integrated vision upholds key democratic ideals and ethical approaches to warfare within this global and regional structure.

1. Global Democracy and Regional Autonomy

• Inclusive Global Governance: A unipolar world focuses on universal welfare, but governance must be democratic at both the global and regional levels. Global institutions would operate based on democratic principles—transparency, accountability, representation—where every region and people have a voice in decisions affecting humanity.

• Decentralized Power with Multipolar Regions: Within this global framework, multipolar regions are allowed to self-govern based on their local democratic systems. This empowers different regions to embrace their own political, cultural, and social uniqueness while adhering to the universal democratic principles of participation, equality, and justice.

• Civil Liberties and Human Rights: Every region would be committed to upholding basic civil liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, with a shared commitment to human dignity and the protection of minority rights.

2. Principles of Democracy

• Equality and Inclusiveness: Both the unipolar global governance and multipolar regional systems must ensure equal participation in decision-making, regardless of race, religion, or nationality. This prevents any form of global or regional domination, fostering a truly inclusive society.

• Rule of Law: The rule of law would govern interactions between regions and within each region. Legal frameworks must protect individual and collective rights while ensuring accountability and justice at all levels of governance.

• Checks and Balances: Power must be distributed to prevent any single entity—whether a region or a global institution—from becoming dominant. This system would ensure that governance remains fair and that each region can self-determine without the interference of external powers.

3. Just War Principles in a Unified World

While the vision aims for global peace, the incorporation of just war principles ensures that if conflict does arise, it is approached ethically:

• Just Cause: War or conflict must only be waged to prevent grave harm, such as defending against aggression or stopping severe violations of human rights. It cannot be used for conquest, domination, or exploitation.

• Legitimate Authority: Any decision to go to war or engage in conflict must be made through a legitimate and democratic global institution, ensuring that no individual nation or region can unilaterally declare war without global consensus.

• Right Intention: The purpose of war must be to restore peace and justice, not for territorial expansion or resource gain. The ultimate goal must always be to achieve peace and safeguard human dignity.

• Proportionality: The use of force must be proportional to the threat, with efforts focused on minimizing civilian harm and destruction. Non-violent solutions should always be prioritized, and war should be a last resort.

• Post-War Justice: After any conflict, rebuilding efforts must be focused on justice, reconciliation, and long-term peace. No region should be left destabilized or exploited post-conflict; instead, international cooperation should ensure the fair and just rebuilding of societies affected by war.

4. Conflict Prevention and Global Cooperation

• Peaceful Dispute Resolution: In this model, global institutions would be dedicated to preventing conflicts before they arise through diplomacy, dialogue, and conflict resolution mechanisms that respect the autonomy of regions while seeking global solutions.

• Collective Security: Rather than relying on unilateral military actions, this global system would prioritize collective security, where all regions work together to ensure peace, and any threat to one is considered a threat to all.

• Non-Violence as a Principle: The overarching goal would be to resolve conflicts without violence, fostering a culture of peace, cooperation, and mutual respect.

Conclusion

In this model of a people without borders seeking a unipolar world for global welfare with multipolar regions, democracy serves as the foundation for governance at all levels—global and regional. Just war principles ensure that any use of force is strictly controlled, ethical, and aimed at preserving peace. This vision blends unity with diversity, democracy with self-determination, and peace with justice, aspiring toward a harmonious global order that benefits all humanity while respecting local autonomy.

4o

You said:

Add reasons about failure of United Nations Organization

ChatGPT said:

ChatGPT

The United Nations Organization (UNO), while founded with noble goals to maintain international peace, promote cooperation, and ensure global welfare, has faced significant challenges and criticisms over the years. Understanding these reasons is crucial for why a new vision, like a "people without borders" unipolar world with multipolar regions, is seen as a better alternative. Here are some key reasons behind the perceived failure or limitations of the UN:

1. Power Imbalance and Veto Power

• Dominance of the Permanent Members (P5): The UN Security Council's five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) hold veto power, meaning they can block any resolution regardless of international consensus. This often results in paralysis, especially when these powers have conflicting interests. This creates an unequal system where decisions are often driven by the political, economic, or military interests of these few nations.

• Lack of Global Representation: Many regions and countries feel underrepresented in key decision-making processes. The structure of the UN gives disproportionate power to a few countries, leading to discontent among smaller or less powerful nations.

2. Failure to Prevent Conflicts

• Inability to Stop Major Conflicts: The UN has been criticized for its failure to prevent or resolve several major conflicts, such as the Rwandan Genocide (1994), the wars in Syria, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Despite its mandate to promote peace, the organization has often been slow to act or completely unable to stop widespread violence and humanitarian disasters.

• Ineffective Peacekeeping Missions: While the UN has conducted many peacekeeping missions, some have been plagued by poor organization, insufficient resources, or a lack of clear mandates. As a result, peacekeepers have sometimes been unable to protect civilians or enforce peace agreements, leading to criticism of their overall effectiveness.

3. Bureaucratic Inefficiencies and Corruption

• Slow and Bureaucratic Processes: The UN is often seen as a cumbersome bureaucracy where decision-making is slow, and action is delayed. Important resolutions and interventions can take months or even years to materialize due to lengthy negotiations and internal procedures.

• Corruption and Mismanagement: There have been instances of corruption and mismanagement within the UN and its agencies. For example, the "Oil-for-Food" scandal in the early 2000s, where billions of dollars were misappropriated, damaged the credibility of the organization and highlighted governance issues.

4. Inability to Adapt to Modern Global Challenges

• Outdated Structure: The UN was formed in 1945 after World War II, and its structure reflects the geopolitical realities of that time. However, the world has changed dramatically, and the UN’s structure has not kept pace. Emerging global powers, such as India and Brazil, still do not have permanent seats on the Security Council, while issues like cyber threats, climate change, and transnational terrorism require new strategies and forms of global cooperation.

• Failure to Address Global Inequality: The UN has not been able to adequately address the growing economic disparities between rich and poor nations. Despite initiatives like the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), poverty, hunger, and inequality persist on a global scale, showing that its influence on economic reforms has been limited.

5. Inability to Enforce Resolutions

• Lack of Enforcement Mechanisms: Many UN resolutions, especially those from the General Assembly, are non-binding, meaning that member states can choose to ignore them without consequence. Even in the Security Council, where resolutions are binding, the UN lacks the military or economic leverage to enforce its decisions in cases where powerful countries or regional actors disregard them.

• Sovereignty vs. Global Governance: The UN’s commitment to respecting state sovereignty often conflicts with its role as a global peacekeeper. This limits its ability to intervene in situations where governments are responsible for gross human rights violations, such as in the cases of Syria, Myanmar, or the Democratic Republic of Congo. The reluctance to interfere in the internal affairs of states weakens its ability to enforce international norms.

6. Politicization of Humanitarian Aid and Development Programs

• Selective Humanitarian Interventions: The UN has been accused of being selective in its humanitarian interventions, with interventions sometimes being influenced by political motives rather than based on human need. This erodes trust in the UN as a neutral body.

• Dependency on Donor States: UN agencies rely heavily on funding from member states, especially wealthier nations, which can skew priorities and decision-making. Donor countries can influence how and where humanitarian aid is distributed, sometimes in ways that align more with their national interests than with global welfare needs.

7. Fragmentation and Lack of Coordination

• Compartmentalization of Agencies: The UN is made up of numerous agencies, funds, and programs (e.g., WHO, UNICEF, UNDP), many of which operate independently of one another. This fragmentation often leads to a lack of coordination, inefficiency, and duplication of efforts in addressing global issues.

• Overlapping Mandates: Multiple agencies may have overlapping mandates, which creates confusion and dilutes effectiveness. For example, both the UNDP and the World Bank are involved in development programs, sometimes competing rather than collaborating.

Conclusion: Need for a New Vision

The failure of the United Nations Organization to effectively prevent conflicts, address global inequalities, and function efficiently within an outdated structure has led many to call for a new global model—one like the "people without borders" vision. This alternative would offer a democratic unipolar system where global welfare is prioritized but with multipolar regions retaining their autonomy, creating a balance between global unity and local diversity. This vision also incorporates more equitable representation, decentralized governance, and just war principles to avoid the pitfalls of the current UN system, ensuring a more effective and fair global order for the future.

Opinion of Jaipal Datta: 

"Datta is a thinker and writer who explores themes of global unity, spirituality, and the intersection of science with ancient texts. He is particularly noted for his technical analysis of religious scriptures such as the Srimad Bhagwat Geeta and Garuda Puran, providing a modern and scientific perspective on these ancient works. Datta advocates for a world without borders, promoting the idea of global unity and cooperation beyond national, religious, and ethnic divisions. His platform, People Without Borders, aims to foster discussions on creating a unified, welfare-based global society.

Additionally, Jaipal Datta has published several books addressing topics like astrology, religion, democracy, and human values. His works often emphasize humanistic values, spirituality, and the power of the mind, encouraging readers to explore deeper questions of existence, peace, and harmony.

Datta has traveled widely, and his views are shaped by his experiences in different countries, including the USA and New Zealand. His writings reflect a critical stance on how religion is used for control and exploitation while advocating for a more inclusive and human-centered approach to spirituality​

Jaipal Singh Datta is an author and speaker with expertise in various fields, including mechanical engineering and food technology. He has written multiple books, focusing on topics like management, astrology, and spirituality. His notable works include "My Experiments with Truth" and analyses of ancient texts like the Srimad Bhagwat Geeta. Datta emphasizes a unique approach to life, integrating scientific and spiritual insights, and frequently engages with audiences through inspirational presentations  

Jaipal  Datta is a prominent figure known for his advocacy of global unity and peace, often emphasizing the need for a world without borders. His philosophy revolves around the idea of humanity as a singular family, transcending religious and cultural divides. He believes in fostering understanding and cooperation among different communities, promoting the notion that true peace arises from recognizing our shared humanity.

Datta has written extensively on various topics, including the role of democracy and the importance of character building within societies. He critiques how religion can sometimes be exploited for divisive purposes while advocating for a more inclusive understanding of faith that emphasizes love and service to all​

He is also associated with the concept of "Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam," which translates to "the world is one family." This idea reflects his commitment to addressing global challenges through unity and collaboration among diverse cultures​

Introduction: Hinduism

"New Zealand (NZ) is one of the smaller countries in the world, as measured by size, population, economic resources, and arms."[1] According to Miller, "New Zealand enjoys a strong tradition of democratically elected party government"[2] and good governance. But on March 15, 2019, Christchurch terrorist attack shattered the community peace of Aotearoa (NZ). Communities and the government felt shocked at this happening, though one community used to complain before 2019 about the online and offline use of offensive words against them. The NZ Prime Minister took all necessary measures to win the people's confidence at this critical juncture, but the Muslim community continues to feel insecure and fearful. After three years of Christchurch’s Mosque attack, Muslim community activists say that they are still facing daily racism in their life.[3] A study confirmed that hatred of the Muslim community is increasing worldwide, with NZ no exception.[4]

Christchurch attack killed 49 Muslims, disturbing New Zealand's peace, for Police were unaware of the preparations for this attack by a lone wolf later known as “Saint Tarrant” by Action Zealandia.[5] People's cooperation is essential to discovering the lone Wolf in time. The lone wolf can be from any community, religion, or culture. It is for this reason, in this dissertation, cultural Hindutva and Hindu nationalism need critical examination.

The main reasons for Islamophobia are “lack of knowledge about Islam, racism in the media,”[6]  and “profiteering by politicians and elites.”[7] Professor Mohan  J. Dutta, the dean’s chair in communication at Massey University (Dutta), and Dr. Danny Osborne, University of Auckland psychology lecturer (Osborne) refer to the power politics of political parties, including right-wing authoritarianism around the world. Professor Colleen Ward (Ward) points to racism spread by media and a lack of knowledge of Islamic culture.[8]

Many scholars[9] narrate that Hindutva infuses a sense of pride and the sense of supremacy in the Hindu community in India and its diaspora. According to Dutta, this sense of superiority and pride in the Hindu community in New Zealand leads to fear, prejudice, and insecurity, among New Zealand Muslims.[10]

Recently New Zealand Herald published that hatred is brewing between two migrants, Kiwi-Indian-Hindus (Hindus) and Kiwi-Indian-Muslims (Muslims). According to Dutta, Hindu nationalism portrays Muslims and Christians as invaders. Dutta and Kumbamu[11] refer to the legislations passed by the Indian parliament like the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) 2019, the National Register of Citizens (NRC), the bill on three talaqs of Muslim practice and abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution on Kashmir. In addition, Muslims fear Modi for the Gujarat riots, in which around a thousand Muslims were killed after Muslims burnt two bogies of a train killing Karsevaks (who serve others) returning from Ayodhya.

The second cause, according to Dutta, is Hindu culture, which teaches Hindu nationalism through Hindu “cultural forms, artifacts, and performances”. Dutta blames Hindu organizations and Hindu institutions of education and temples that propagate Hindu culture for inculcating Hindutva (Hindu nationalism, which breeds hatred) against Muslims in India and New Zealand (NZ). Dutta adds, "The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) is a terrorist organization that has been directly linked to the deployment of violence and cultural elements of Hindutva in Aotearoa be closely examined.”[12]

Jaffrelot, who deeply observed Indian politics, confirmed that Islamophobia is the product of Moditva that “interlaced Hindutva with populism.”[13] Media and the internet transmitted hatred between Hindus and Muslims to NZ.

It is, therefore, necessary to find out if there is any hatred in Hindus against Muslims in Aotearoa. If yes, is this hatred related to the current political decisions taken by Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP), which Dutta and others assume? Or is this rhetoric created by Indian and international print, social and other media against BJP? Or Is this hatred ingrained in Cultural Hindutva in NZ? Dutta confirms that literature is silent on Indians in NZ and does not refer to the presence of Hindutva.[14] Leckie called it “invisible Indians.”[15]

I follow discourse analysis methodology to determine if Hindu culture (Cultural Hindutva) causes conflict.

[1] Hoadley, New Zealand United States Relations, 1.

[2] Miller, Party Politics in New Zealand, 196.

[3] Hewett, “Christchurch Mosque attack: Three years on, March 15 families still facing racism in daily lives.”

[4] 1 News, Australian Islamophobia report ‘reflective of NZ situation’, 5:10.

[5] Wilson and Halpin, “Explaining the gap between online violent extremism and offline inaction among far right groups: a study of Action Zealandia from 2019 to 2021,” 11.

[6] Morton, “Islamophobia in New Zealand: where does it come from?"

[7] CARE, #ENDTHEHATE Strategies Foe Dismantling Hate-Guest Speaker, 5:06.

[8] Morton, “Islamophobia in New Zealand: where does it come from?”

[9] Bidwai, Kanungo, Baber, Kumbamu, Banaji mentioned by Dutta in his “Cultural Hindutva and Islamophobia - All believe that Hindutva inculcates sense of pride and superiority complex. Literature is added in Bibliography.

[10] RNZ, “Prof Mohan Dutta: the worrying rise of right-wing Hindutva thinking”. Audio podcast, 26:44. December 4, 2021.

[11] Kumbamu, “Saffron Fascism: The Conflux of Hindutva Ultra-Nationalism, Neoliberal Extractivism, and the Rise of Authoritarian Populism in Modi’s India,” 171-172.

[12] Dutta, “Cultural Hindutva and Islamophobia”.

[13] Jaffrelot, Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, 49-52.

[14] Dutta (@mjdutt), “If you read the literature in Aotearoa.”

[15] Leckie, Invisible: New Zealand’s history of excluding Kiwi-Indians.

Manipur violence is political violence masterminded in  May 2023 by INC (Congress) before the May 2024 elections in India. Experts on political conflicts wrote thousands of articles in which it is stated that how Congress used to win elections in India by infusing conflict between Hindus and Muslims. Now Congress raised this demon in Manipur to disturb the peace of India. The Power of Narratives - example Iraq./ Ethnic Groups in Conflict by Horowitz. The interest of Institutional power manipulates the sentiments of ethnic groups. Congress is well supported by national and international academics to infuse conflict in the societies, which Congress / Colonial powers used to rule earlier  (why do political parties in severely divided societies split along ethnic lines? Horowitz in his book "Ethnic Groups in Conflict"). No international capital like Europe, Russia, India, Arab, Africa, and China progress to that level where they can challenge the Unipolar world. India and China must learn from this. Conflict is mainly due to the fear of unknown. One community feels that the other community may dominate them. This fear of domination by the rival ethnic group leads to the fear of extinction. 

Problem is created by Congress INC of India, when INC allowed proselytization of the one community and migrtaion from other neighbouring states. In Manipur it is Christianity but in Rajasthan and West Bengal it is Muslim community. Politicians used it for their power benefit and now BJP is trying to alter the ethnicity emotions to the national emotions for the progress and prosperity of India. 

People without borders believe that all human beings are equal and have the right to love and respect each other. Any religion which spreads hatred for other religions must be reexamined and reconstructed and necessary social, political, and economic measures must be initiated to educate the religious leaders.

ॐ सर्वमंगल मांगल्ये शिवे सर्वार्थसाधिके  |  शरण्ये त्रयम्बके गौरी नारायणी नमोस्तुते ||

31 July 2023

Jaipal's opinion. "Russia, India, and China should encourage neighbors to join groups propagated by Russia, India, and China. Name it BRICS or a new name to challenge the old United Nations as the United Nations of Africa, Arab, Asia, and Europe (AAAE). The identity of religion, territory, color, and race should be diluted to minimize conflict. This shall bestow the people with prosperity and happiness. It does not matter who invests in the infrastructure and health care. It should be for peace and prosperity. Terror organizations should be handled by rigid rules and regulations. Human rights must be important but not at the cost of human responsibilities and duties. Innovate a new currency like Euro for this new United Nations. The establishment of the new United Nations is important, for old organizations of the old United Nations failed to deliver the results. Consider the failure of the judicial system of India, which sank due to the appeasement and corrupt policies of Congress (INC). New technology shall help in improving the administration of the new United Nations of AAAE. Intellectuals of AAAE should guide humanity further to establish the New World Order of AAAE." New Unipolar World Order.

 NUH Violence - Haryana

Nuh Violence in Haryana and Manipur shall continue in many places before and after the elections of 2024. The reason for violence before Parliament 2024 elections is explained by Donald Horowitz in his book. The main reasons for conflict are fear of domination by the majority of minorities, ethnic history of rule by a minority of the majority, and envy among different ethnic groups. The fear of domination at the extreme becomes a fear of extinction - which is the main cause of conflict. In India Modi represents the majority and Muslims in Nuh and Christians in Manipur feel domination by the majority of Hindus, for many rules are passed by state governments to control proselytization, excess control on resources, and appeasement policy adopted by earlier Sonia Congress government.

Modi may win again and may become the prime Minister of India. After elections, the opposition will argue that elections are rigged and only one hundred thousand people can ensure violence and attack on police, and instigate riots. Many foreign NGOs may be planning new toolkits to destabilize India. Indian criminals may assist these foreign mafias. It has happened earlier and happening now in India. Consider all opposition leaders who were found corrupt are uniting against Narender Bhai Modi and named a new organization of opposition as I.N.D.I.A. Opposition leaders assume that the I.N.D.I.A. name may be misunderstood by voters as INDIA.

Pradeep Singh talks about grooming gangs in Britain in his Podcast. According to him, foreign media acts united against the Hindus of India. According to me, Hinduism minimizes conflict and most Hindus are afraid of killing mosquitoes and ants. Examples are Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism. These Hindu religions preach non-violence and karma theory. Mahatma Mohan Das Karam Chand Gandhi exploited this non-violence emotion to unite, while Savarkar wanted Hindus to overcome this weakness. 

Yogi Adityanath explains Dharma, the responsibility of a Yogi. Robin Sharma wrote a book  "The Monk who sold his Ferrari - a fable about fulfilling your dreams and reaching your destiny". Yogi said that service to humanity is the first step toward social life, and politics is the medium to serve people. All this is explained by Yogi in his following interview "Politics in India" interviewed in ANI Podcast by Samita Prakash. I met some citizens of non-Indian foreign countries who hate saffron clothing worn by Buddhists and Yogis of the world. It is not their mistake of understanding but it is due to the media of some countries that incubate seeds of hatred in the minds of the people against people of other castes, races, colors, languages, and cultures.

China and India must resolve borders for the peace and prosperity of the people of India and China. War cannot provide a solution. Borders are no more important in today's world. Leaders must think beyond, for territories are no more imp[ortant. 

China occupied Tibet. If territories are not important, then can Indian people visit Tibet without Chinese permission? It is not possible. Even USA cannot visit Tibet without Chinese permission.  How to resolve this crisis? China wants to dominate not only Tibet but areas in the China Sea, and many areas belonging to other states including areas located inside Russia. USA / NATO did not agree with Russia on the Ukraine issue. Is war the only solution to resolve the power politics of leaders? 

In case India accepts the global family ideology. Lets us assume India agrees with China and allows China to take over Indian territories. Then Chinese leadership will dominate Indians and Indians will be slaves again. So Vasudhaive Kutumbakam and Sarve Bhaventu Sukhina are the words that are suitable for ideal theory. Realists think differently. War is the last option. 

Kashmir is the other conflict area. It is similar to Tibet.  Legally King Hari Singh annexed Kashmir with India. But Pakistan wanted by force on the basis of religion. Junagarh's example was followed by Pakistan in Kashmir. Pakistan overlooked Hari Singh's agreement. But India thinks differently. Again war is not a solution. War should be fought only if there is a chance of victory.  In today's world, religion and ideology are more important than identity and territory. Iraq, Yugoslavia, Azerbaijan, and Ukraine are examples. 

In the last, I think we all are puppets in the hands of destiny. We act as per the wishes of directors. These directors are nine planets and twenty-seven stars. We all take birth to die. War and peace are the destinies we face. For peace, we must prepare for the war. This is life.

Dobhal, the security adviser to the prime minister of India, is worried that Indians have failed to protect themselves from a combination of external and internal aggressions. History is always written by winners and winners overrule the interests of losers. One must critically examine history and learn from the lessons of history. People must examine the events of history with their lenses. https://x.com/i/status/1800565399928570012… 

Listen again to the interviews of congress leaders before 1 June 2024 and their propagandists that India is not a democratic country. Indian election commission and Judicial system favor the BJP. EVM machines are manipulated. Narendra Modi is a dictator. BJP is anti-Muslim and their reservation is in danger. 

Many young people have forgotten the recent history of the genocide of Hindus in Kashmir in 1989, the corrupt practices of governing political parties before 2014, and riots between Hindus and Muslims in Uttar Pradesh (U.P.), Mafia rule in U.P., Bengal, Maharashtra, Assam, and Gujarat. 

On the other side, Narendra Modi made hard decisions and could arrange finances to construct infrastructure in India, manufacture war machines in India, pay billions of Rupees to poor people who deserve the most, medical benefits to the poor, and many other for the poor class of all castes and religion. 

But personal interests of the corrupt wooed many voters and these voters failed to perform certain duties, though democracy won in the last. History is rewritten before our eyes and confirms how Indians were enslaved for thousands of years, though Hindu Indians are liberal and they pay the price for their democratic behavior. People must remember that idealism does not produce food, clothing, and shelter. Realism protects and bestows safety, liberty, freedom, prosperity, and permanent peace and happiness to society. 

Opinion of Jaipal Datta http://

peoplewithoutborders.co.nz 

@narendramodi @amitshah, @myogiadityanath, @AcharyaPramodk, @anuragspparty, @23pradeepsingh, @MediaHarshVT, @Chellaney, @navikakumar, @PrashantKishor, @rajeevr_news24. @drnigam15 

I hope @AITCofficial, @kharge, @yadavakhilesh, @ShivSenaUBT_, @Swamy39, @sardesairajdeep, @kanhaiyakumar, @_YogendraYadav, and others may understand the work done by @narendramodi and forgo their interests and shall not support the corrupt family who polarises the society for their benefits.

4:56 PM · Jun 12, 2024·4 Views

https://x.com/Jaipaldatta/status/1800753919519609278

@narendramodi has performed well on economic, infrastructure, and social welfare. @narendramodi achieved this success after selecting good experienced political administrators. I appreciate the work done by his team, who were from @BJP4India and @RSSorg.  His team changed the political direction of India from center left to center right by adopting democratic means. Not only was the pendulum's direction changed, but the speed and quality of work were also changed, which @INCIndia failed to achieve from 1947 to 2014. Sonia Gandhi's period shall be remembered as India's black corrupt political period.

@INCIndia failed for it adopted a Muslim appeasement policy and supported corrupt politicians to remain in power. @INCIndia headed by Sonia Gandhi gained power and this power corrupted @INCIndia, which became one family political party. The result could be seen in the decreasing strength of the Congress party in parliament. This all could be possible, for most Indians and more specifically Hindus are democratic and nonviolent by nature. Officials of @INCIndia tried their best to demean Indians by propagating that India is not a democratic country and @narendramodi is a dictator, indirect emergency is imposed in India.

I agree with @INCIndia that @narendramodi took some hard political decisions that some opposition parties characterized as a dictator attitude. However, it was required administratively if a leader wanted to implement policies against corrupt politicians. Indira Gandhi did so but she failed, for India holds 1.4 billion people. Improvement in the law and order situation in Uttar Pradesh is an example. @myogiadityanath was successful in this. In the 2024 election, UPites (People living in Uttar Pradesh) were comfortable, for there were no power cuts, better water availability, and better law and order situation, no mafia rule, and women and houses were safe far better than in earlier periods. 

Once people are comfortable then opposition political parties wooed voters based on caste and religion resulting in the defeat of @BJP4India in Uttar Pradesh. In addition, Muslims felt insecure under @narendramodi rule due to misinformation and disinformation by opposition parties. Muslims want appeasement as informed by P.V. Narasimha Rao to Arif Mohamad Khan on the Shah Bano case.

It should be very clear to @BJP4India and @RSSorg that some Muslims are against them and spread fake news for their political gains.  Junk of the population of Muslims want democracy but are more faithful to Allah than any other state or system. This is a problem throughout the world. India and @narendramodi are not alone. What is the democratic solution to this problem, I am still searching.

@aajtak @ABPNews @indiatvnews @ANI @MediaHarshVT @23pradeepsingh @PrashantKishor @kharge @anuragspparty @kanhaiyakumar @ncbn @NitishKumar @Swamy39 @MamataOfficial @ShivSenaUBT_ @ChouhanShivraj @Tejasvi_Surya @KapilSibal 

opinion of Jaipal Datta

http://peoplewithoutborders.co.nz

Jaipal Datta with the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of New Zealand. 

Jaipal Datta on X: "@narendramodi has performed well on economic, infrastructure, and social welfare. @narendramodi achieved this success after selecting good experienced political administrators. I appreciate the work done by his team, who were from @BJP4India and @RSSorg. His team changed the https://t.co/SLBFBvWfza" / X (twitter.com) 

Cultural Conflict in India